Should the scrum master attend to backlog grooming?

Should the scrum master attend to backlog grooming?

The grooming of the product backlog is not yet a formal Scrum meeting. We might jeopardize the delivery of whatever product backlog item they are working on if we force that individual to attend another meeting. Backlog grooming should require 5 to 10% of the work in each sprint, according to a good rule of thumb. If you estimate that it will take you 20 hours to review the current state of your product backlog and plan for the next sprint, then you should allocate about 2 hours per week for this purpose.

Your goal is to produce a prioritized list of features to be worked on in the next release. You can do this in a number of ways, such as using a simple voting process by the team or holding a separate meeting for this purpose. The important thing is that the team votes on the features they think will have the greatest impact for the business, and that they are aware that other features exist and may even be higher priority than some of those listed. You should try not to let any feature languish in the backlog for too long; if it isn't going to be completed within a sprint then it shouldn't stay in the backlog for more than one sprint.

You should also consider how much time you want to spend on this activity. Some companies find that they need several people who work independently from each other to provide input on the product backlog, while others find this process takes only a few hours a month.

How often should backlog grooming occur in Agile?

Grooming the product backlog is common two to three days before the conclusion of a sprint. Two or three days before the conclusion of a sprint, someone in the team is nearly always furiously busy. They're reviewing their work with the rest of the team, identifying features that weren't completed during the current sprint, and planning what will be done between now and the next sprint. This person might also be preparing for the next sprint by writing down any important questions that come up during the review, or planning out how they'll use their time between now and then.

As long as everyone knows which features are being postponed and why, there's no problem with leaving some things off the list. In fact, it's useful information for the team to have because it helps them plan future iterations better. However, if someone finds themselves working on something that isn't part of the sprint goal, but feels like it needs to be finished soon, they should discuss it with the rest of the team first and see if anyone else wants to take on extra work. Sometimes, people feel bad about delaying certain features/tasks/bugs, so they try to finish them all alone. But this can be dangerous because they may not identify problems with the features that they add outside of the normal review process.

What is user story grooming?

Backlog grooming, also known as backlog refinement or story time, is a common occurrence for agile product development teams. Add crucial contextual information and acceptance criteria to incoming user stories to ensure they match the team's "definition of ready."

User stories must be groomed to meet two goals: defining a simple testable problem and providing context and motivation for the story. The first step in grooming a user story is to separate it into its essential elements: who, what, when, where, and why. This decomposition helps make sure that none of the elements are missing and that the whole story makes sense. You should always ask yourself questions such as "Who needs to do this?" and "Why would they want to do this?" before you start writing.

After separating out the who, what, when, where, and why of the story, the next step is to add some context and motivation. What is the need that drives someone to want to do this? Why does it matter to them? How will they know if it works as expected? These are all important questions to ask yourself when refining your user stories. Without context and motivation, a user story is just a piece of paper with a title on it. It can't be tested or implemented yet!

Finally, you should always plan to implement some form of validation or proof of concept before you write any code.

About Article Author

Elizabeth Jory

Elizabeth Jory is a lifestyle writer and Instagram influencer who loves to share advice for women on how they can take care of themselves in this crazy world.

Related posts